Heliotactic Press

Interdisciplinary exploration of solar energy conversion, photovoltaics, and integrative design, and scientific philosophy.

Sustainability and Technology in the Habitable Environment 2010/01/02

In the USA, we  divide energy demand into four economic sectors: Industry, Transportation, Commercial Buildings, and Residential Buildings. By combining the Commercial and Residential sectors, we observe that 41% of our energy demand is derived from building environments (the habitable environment), and about 40% of our carbon emissions are derived from buildings. Additionally, Americans have been observed to spend 90% of their time indoors. This is a big chunk of power that we can work to make more sustainable! So what is sustainable energy technology, and why should we even use it?

Energy Flows (supply and demand) USA 2008

As seen in the figure, the majority of our energy supply has been from unsustainable sources (with the loose exception of hydropower). At some point I would like to provide a similarly enhanced figure that demonstrates the energy losses associated with supply and demand (for the curious: see here).

In terms of energy technology development and entrepreneurship, we may establish four generic divisions: energy supply, demand, storage/capacity, and usage. But energy technology development has a historical balance to be made with design, planning, policy and regulation. So why should we pursue sustainable energy solutions at all, or what is our sustainability ethic? Sustainability in planning and international policy can be addressed using the 1987 UN document Our Common Future (derived from the 1987 Brundtland Commission). It’s not the end-all document, but I would call it a good start for discussion and a must read for those learning about the history of modern sustainable energy solutions. The following list of general principals, rights and responsibiliteis comes directly from the Brundtland Commission report, Annexe 1:

Fundamental Human Right

1. All human beings have the fundamental right to an environment adequate for their health and well being.

Inter-Generational Equity

2. States shall conserve and use the environment and natural resources for the benefit of present and future generations.

Conservation and Sustainable Use

3. States shall maintain ecosystems and ecological processes essential for the functioning of the biosphere, shall preserve biological diversity, and shall observe the principle of optimum sustainable yield in the use of living natural resources and ecosystems.

Environmental Standards and Monitoring

4. States shall establish adequate environmental protection standards and monitor changes in and publish relevant data on environmental quality and resource use.

Prior Environmental Assessments

5. States shall make or require prior environmental assessments of proposed activities which may significantly affect the environment or use of a natural resource.

Prior Notification, Access, and Due Process

6. States shall inform in a timely manner all persons likely to be significantly affected by a planned activity and to grant them equal access and due process in administrative and judicial proceedings.

Sustainable Development and Assistance

7. States shall ensure that conservation is treated as an integral part of the planning and implementation of development activities and provide assistance to other States, especially to countries of the global South, in support of environmental protection and sustainable development.

General Obligation to Cooperate

8. States shall cooperate in good faith with other States in implementing the preceding rights and obligations.

Looking over this entire document, I find interesting underpinnings driving sustainable planning and design of energy flows. It is interesting that the argument here is much more than just a caution against climate change and loss of habitable space. Wow: inter-generational equity and ecosystem maintainence–heavy topics to consider. Additionally, the concept of Managing the Commons in Ch. 10 suggests an international valuation of common human resources that fall outside of national jurisdictions, but have critical importance due to ecological and economic interdependence.

And back to the technologies for the habitable environment:

For sustainable energy applications, an energy supply technology might take the form of algae-based biodisel production, wind power, or solar hot water (we typically call this division renewable energy). An energy demand technology addresses the management of the demand side of energy use (we typically term this division energy efficiency), specifically including efficiency in appliances and HVAC systems, weatherization of homes, and new lighting designs. Energy storage and capacity technologies are often lumped with other divisions, but they do include a significant share of tech: water tanks, phase change materials embedded in the walls, green roofs, batteries and ultracapacitors, and even the electrical power grid (to a certain extent). Finally, energy usage technologies are some of the more interesting developments of late, as they take advantage of modifying human behavior, just like the “Prius (or Honda Civic) effect”. Humans work well when given feedback (it’s like a game!), and much of our energy Demand (in the generic sense of the figure above) can be dramatically shifted toward reduction due to smart systems that inform you instantaneously as you consume energy. We used an amazing system for live monitoring by the company Noveda for the Natural Fusion home in the 2009 Solar Decathlon–very very cool technology.

We often hear the popular media discussion on buzz terms of “renewables” and “energy efficiency”. I have found that the innovation in the field of sustainable energy for the habitable environment is developing sufficiently to merit this new subdivision of scope. Perhaps this will even develop new discussions to refine the divisions for useful application in industry and transportation sectors.

 

Innovation and Rules of Thumb 2009/08/03

Filed under: education,interdisciplinary research,Uncategorized — nanomech @ 07:49
Tags:

Why are Rules of Thumb (RoT) useful for certain occasions, why do they tend to lose meaning with time, and when should they be discarded for new horizons? We find RoT to be historically and regionally limiting because they have been integrated within the context of the whole system for a relevant interval in time. Never forget the importance of the environment and the system, as RoT are embedded within the environment that surrounds them! RoT are shorthand transmissions that assist our memories for annual cycles or infrequent events, and provide an initial story for further expansion of lore. As such, RoT have a shelf life when misused: typically devolving over repeated transmissions (that do not expand with lore) such that they lose contact to the original environment that gave them meaning in the first place. We are often presented with RoT that are so general and uninformative that they may actually be of limited use to the challenge at hand. Worse yet, RoT may actually stunt or inhibit our ability to transform a new context into a useful fresh application.

Lore: all the facts and traditions about a particular subject that have been accumulated over time through education or experience.

The source of all RoT on the web!

“A rule of thumb…is an easy-to-remember guide that falls somewhere between a mathematical formula and a shot in the dark. A farmer, for in­stance, knows to plant his corn when oak leaves are the size of squirrels’ ears. An economics profes­sor knows from sad experience that inviting more than 25 percent of the guests for a univer­sity dinner party from the economics depart­ment ruins the conversation. Rules of thumb are a kind of tool. They help you appraise a problem or situation. They make it easier to consider the subtleties of the topic at hand; they give you a feel for a subject.

A hundred years ago, people used rules of thumb to make up for a lack of facts. Modern­ day rule of thumbing is rooted in an overabundance of facts. The average person, confronted with the Internet’s oceans of data and multiple overlapping Ph.D. dissertations, often is as perplexed as a pioneer chemist trying to whip up a little gun­powder without a formula. A pilot in a tight spot doesn’t ask questions about aeronautical en­gineering; a pilot in a tight spot asks “now what?” There are times when you don’t need to know the best way to do something. These are times for ballpark figures, for knowing what you probably can get away with.”

 

What to do with solar in the economic turndown 2009/03/21

Filed under: education,energy,photovoltaics,Solar Decathlon,solar energy — nanomech @ 10:24

As you may have noted, I am in the process of developing this blog that extends beyond (Nanomech in Photovoltaics). The reasons? First, the Sun allows for a plethora of possibilities, and I wanted to work with a bigger canvas! Second, I feel the need to open up the blog to entries from guests, to create a diverse perspective of all things tied to solar (including energy efficiency, green roofs, passive solar design, energy recovery and cogeneration). And third, and most frankly, PV is the most expensive solar investment for the individual. In this economic depression, we need to know what technologies are affordable and offer the highest rewards for the initial investment. I’ve been told again and again that solar hot water is the most obvious, no-brainer tactic in the solar arsenal. It’s cheap (< $6000 for everything), it’s easy, and by replacing/complementing your electric or gas (or fuel oil) water tank (with federal and state incentives), payback is often less than 5 years.

My recent experiences have included teaching solar energy conversion, developing tools for solar resource assessment, and leading a great team to design, build, and operate a solar-powered house (www.solar.psu.edu). From these endeavors, it was obvious that it would be beneficial to pass along the great breadth of solar energy conversion possibilities.

So, I still hope to post on photovoltaics (still my favorite, and I am a materials researchers in PV), but expect to see more on diverse topics in the future.

 

Solar technologies are really quite diverse 2008/12/25

In preparing for my annual Spring course “Design of Solar Energy Conversion Systems”, I am reminded of just how many diverse technologies can be derived from our nearest large-scale fusion reactor. I will make exceptions to the obvious: horticulture and wind energy are derived from the sun too.

Here are some ideas beyond PV and concentrating PV (CPV):

  1. Passive/Active Solar Water Heating Systems (in your showers, dishwashers, heating your floors)
  2. Commercial/Distributed Space Heating Systems (using Solar Walls, Phase Change materials, Pebble-bed hot air storage).
  3. Solar Cooling (Yes! you can cool with the sun and heat pumps, dessicants, refrigeration cycles).
  4. Solar Industrial Process Heat and Solar Ponds (Do you own a mine or a refinery? Look into ways that you could dramatically reduce your energy bills!)
  5. Solar Thermal Power Systems (Also called Concentrating Solar Power–CSP–this is the technology with the best odds at being the next wave of electric power from the sun).
  6. Don’t forget solar chemistry (not just growing plants) to make hydrogen and other fuels!

Solar is very close to breaking out. Why not invest in solar tech?

 

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.